To submit your manuscript, please visit our journals’ webpage. Select your desired journal based on its scope, log in to your account, and follow the five simple steps to complete your submission.

A manuscript is subjected to a rigorous peer-review process conducted by experts in the field, who evaluate its originality, methodology, significance, and adherence to ethical guidelines. Subsequently, the editorial team makes a decision based on the reviewers’ recommendations. Articles that are of high quality, well-researched, and contribute meaningfully to the field have a greater likelihood of acceptance.

Our publication timeline may vary, but we are committed to providing timely publication. You can expect to receive an initial response within 72 hours after your submission via the appropriate channel. If your submission progresses to the review stage, the duration of this process will depend on the availability of reviewers. On average, we typically receive feedback within 21 days. Please note that the time required for revising the manuscript following review is at the author’s discretion. Once an article is accepted, the production and publication process usually takes about five days. Overall, the entire process generally ranges from one to six months.

Glintplus actively publishes across key disciplines essential for personal and national development, including environmental sciences and technology, agriculture, applied biotechnology, social sciences and management, natural resources, earth sciences, and mining. Explore our list of journals here. We are continually expanding our scope to enhance our impact. If you are interested in partnering with Glintplus Publishing in areas not yet covered, please contact us at publish@glintplus.com.
We offer diverse journal options to accommodate various research areas.

No, simultaneous submissions are generally not accepted. It is important to submit your article
to one journal at a time and await a decision before considering other publication opportunities.

Yes, all our journals are fully open-access. Upon acceptance, authors or their funders are required to make a one-time payment (OTP) for manuscript processing, with fees varying by journal. This charge covers essential services such as editorial support, copy editing, online hosting, and indexing. For further details, please visit our APC page.

We kindly request that manuscripts be submitted in an editable format, such as Microsoft Word (DOC or DOCX). This ensures compatibility and facilitates a smoother review and publication process.

At Glintplus, we prioritise the publication of original and unpublished work. However, we understand that some articles may have undergone significant revisions or have been adapted for different audiences, including translations into languages other than English. If this applies to your submission, please provide comprehensive details during the submission process to assist us in our review.

At Glintplus, we value the rights of authors. You retain the copyright to your article while granting us a non-exclusive license to publish and distribute it. Refer to our author agreement for more information.

Yes, we welcome review articles and opinion pieces that contribute to scholarly discussions. However, they should meet the specified guidelines and provide valuable insights or critical analysis in your field of study.

Yes, our journals strive for indexing in prominent databases like PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. However, please note that indexing is subject to the evaluation and decision of each database.

Glintplus primarily operates as an online publishing platform. Therefore, published articles are generally available in digital format.

Once an article is published, it is considered a final version. However, if there are critical errors or updates needed, you can contact our support team, and we will assess the situation and advise accordingly.

Yes, all articles and books published with Glintplus receive a DOI. The DOI provides a persistent link to your work, making it easily citable and accessible for readers and researchers.

Glintplus supports the use of Creative Commons licenses. These licenses allow you to specify how others can use, distribute, and modify your work while ensuring proper attribution. You can choose the appropriate Creative Commons license during the publication process.

Yes, publishing a preprint before submitting your manuscript to Glintplus is generally allowed. However, it is important to ensure that your chosen journal or publisher allows preprint publication. Review our guidelines and consult the specific journal’s policies before proceeding.

Yes, it is one of our requirements that authors suggest three (3) potential reviewers who are experts in the field during submission. Please refer to the author activities guide of the journal for specific requirements and conditions. However, please note that the final decision regarding reviewer selection lies with the editorial team to maintain an unbiased peer-review process.

Yes, as part of the peer review process, you will receive constructive feedback and comments from reviewers, communicated through the handling editor. This feedback is designed to enhance the quality and impact of your work.

Glintplus actively promotes published articles by spotlighting one featured article on our social media platforms each week. Additionally, we encourage authors to amplify their research impact by sharing their work within their professional networks and across social media channels.

Yes, we offer professional editing and proofreading services to ensure the quality and coherence of your manuscript. Our team can assist with copy editing and proofreading, depending on your needs.

Yes, Glintplus actively enhances the discoverability of published articles by optimising them for search engines such as Google Scholar, Google, and Bing. However, search engine indexing is an independent and dynamic process, and full indexing may take some time.

Yes! However, you must extract key findings, shorten content, and adapt it to journal formatting before submission.

Some key reasons for manuscript rejection include:

• Poor Formatting – Failure to adhere to journal guidelines, making it difficult for editors to assess the work’s clarity and suitability for review.
• Plagiarism Issues – Including both intentional and unintentional self-plagiarism.
• Technical Deficiencies – Incomplete methodology that hinders independent replication, and use of inappropriate protocols, procedures, or parameters.
• Weak Research Contribution – Insufficient presentation and discussion of data, limiting the study’s impact.
• Poor Writing Quality – Lack of a clear rationale, poorly articulated objectives, grammatical errors, punctuation issues, and incoherent content structure.
• Inappropriate Journal Choice – Submitting to a journal that does not align with the research scope.

To enhance the chances of acceptance, authors should proofread thoroughly, follow our author guidelines, select the appropriate journal, and ensure their research is well-founded with a robust methodology.

For assistance, please contact us via publish@glintplus.com

If your manuscript is rejected with suggestions for improvement, you may revise it thoroughly, addressing all comments, and submit it again. However, if it is outright rejected, we recommend considering submission to another suitable journal.

Yes! Glintplus offers partial APC waivers for authors from developing and underdeveloped countries, classified into two categories. Additionally, a full waiver is granted for manuscripts solely authored by a PhD student.

Yes, a cover letter is required. It should provide a concise introduction to your research, emphasise its significance, and include any relevant information for the editors. Additionally, please explain why your manuscript is a suitable fit for our journal.

At Glintplus Publishing, we uphold the standards of quality found in esteemed publishers by meticulously processing manuscripts through four distinct review and publication stages.

1. Editorial Screening: Initially, all submissions undergo an editorial screening to ensure they meet the journal’s basic requirements and guidelines.
2. Expert Peer Review: Following the screening, the manuscript is sent to experts in the relevant field for a thorough peer review. Reviewers assess the quality, originality, and relevance of the work.
3. Decision-Making: Based on the peer reviewers’ feedback, the editorial team makes a decision regarding the manuscript. The possible outcomes include:
   • Revise (minor or major revisions)
   • Resubmit (if substantial improvements are needed)
   • Accept (for publication)
   • Reject (if it does not meet the necessary standards)
4. Production and Publication: Once accepted, the manuscript moves into production, where it is prepared for publication and ultimately made available to the academic community.